Files with the highest combination of change frequency and waste ratio. These are candidates for refactoring or closer review.
Cumulative contribution over time. Watch developers race as positions shift month by month.
Commit activity distribution by hour and day of week across all contributors in this repository.
Performance has many faces. Navigara breaks down the effort to visualize what parts of codebase has been changed and where energy flowed. Our Architect AI can break the performance even further into particular components and patterns.
Breakdown of file changes over time. Play the timeline to see how change types evolved across periods.
Monthly overview of bugs introduced and fixed, based on symbol-level commit analysis. Fixes show whether the original author fixed their own bug (self-fix) or someone else did (cross-fix).
Bug attribution uses symbol-level matching from commit history. For each fix commit, we look at the changed symbols (functions, classes, methods) and trace backwards to find who last modified that symbol in a non-fix commit. This person is the probable bug introducer. The algorithm only works when commits have symbol-level data from the Navigara analysis engine โ the coverage rate shows what percentage of fix commits had this data available.
The current metrics model has a semantic inversion: when developer A creates a feature with a bug, they receive grow (positive). When developer B fixes that bug, they receive waste (negative). The bug creator is rewarded while the fixer is penalized. Bug attribution addresses this by explicitly tracking who introduced bugs and who fixed them, providing a more accurate picture of code quality contributions.
Currently computed client-side from commit data. Ideal server-side endpoint:
POST /v1/repositories/{repositoryId}/bug-attributions
Content-Type: application/json
Request:
{
"startTime": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
"endTime": "2025-12-31T23:59:59Z"
}
Response:
{
"totalBugsAttributed": 42,
"selfFixRate": 35,
"coverageRate": 78,
"attributions": [
{
"filePath": "src/lib/auth.ts",
"symbol": "validateToken",
"introducer": { "name": "Alice", "email": "alice@co.com", "commitSha": "abc123" },
"fixer": { "name": "Bob", "email": "bob@co.com", "commitSha": "def456" },
"fixedAt": "2025-06-15T10:30:00Z",
"isSelfFix": false
}
]
}Reclassifies engineering effort based on bug attribution. Commits that introduced bugs are retrospectively counted as poor investments.
Investment Quality reclassifies engineering effort based on bug attribution data. Commits identified as buggy origins (those that introduced bugs later fixed by someone) have their grow and maintenance time moved into the Wasted Time category. Their waste (fix commits) remains counted as productive. All other commits retain their standard classification: grow is productive, maintenance is maintenance, and waste (fixes) is productive.
The standard model classifies commits as Growth, Maintenance, or Fixes. Investment Quality adds a quality lens: a commit that introduced a bug is retrospectively counted as a poor investment โ the engineering time spent on it was wasted because it ultimately required additional fix work. Fix commits (Fixes in the standard model) are reframed as productive, because fixing bugs is valuable work.
Currently computed client-side from commit and bug attribution data. Ideal server-side endpoint:
POST /v1/organizations/{orgId}/investment-quality
Content-Type: application/json
Request:
{
"startTime": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
"endTime": "2025-12-31T23:59:59Z",
"bucketSize": "BUCKET_SIZE_MONTH",
"groupBy": ["repository_id" | "deliverer_email"]
}
Response:
{
"productivePct": 74,
"maintenancePct": 18,
"wastedPct": 8,
"buckets": [
{
"bucketStart": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
"productive": 4.2,
"maintenance": 1.8,
"wasted": 0.6
}
]
}Latest analyzed commits in this repository.
| Hash | Message | Author | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| de2c7b1 | chore(tests): bump steady to v0.20.2 | stainless-app[bot] | maint |
| 6efca95 | chore(tests): bump steady to v0.20.1 | stainless-app[bot] | maint |
| 2076d85 | feat(api): add phase field to conversations message | stainless-app[bot] | grow |
| 58184ad | Pin GitHub Actions workflow references (#3021) | Drew Hintz | maint |
| c0c59af | fix(types): remove web_search_call.results from ResponseIncludable | stainless-app[bot] | maint |
| ad7cc79 | docs(api): update file parameter descriptions in vector_stores files and file_batches | stainless-app[bot] | maint |
| d392aae | feat(internal): implement indices array format for query and form serialization | stainless-app[bot] | maint |
| 5ae2cc1 | release: 2.30.0 | stainless-app[bot] | maint |
| 6e772ae | fix(api): align SDK response types with expanded item schemas | stainless-app[bot] | grow |
| cd72fba | feat(api): add keys field to Click/DoubleClick/Drag/Move/Scroll computer actions | stainless-app[bot] | grow |
chore(tests): bump steady to v0.20.2
chore(tests): bump steady to v0.20.1
feat(api): add phase field to conversations message
Pin GitHub Actions workflow references (#3021)
fix(types): remove web_search_call.results from ResponseIncludable
docs(api): update file parameter descriptions in vector_stores files and file_batches
feat(internal): implement indices array format for query and form serialization
release: 2.30.0
fix(api): align SDK response types with expanded item schemas
feat(api): add keys field to Click/DoubleClick/Drag/Move/Scroll computer actions
Average context complexity and engagement score of file changes over time. Higher complexity means more intricate changes; higher impact means broader effect on the codebase.
Repository
openai-python
The official Python library for the OpenAI API
Average Developer Performance (ETV)
Year-by-year Trend:+349%Contributors ranked by total performance (ETV) from analyzed commits.
| # | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 142633134+stainless-app[bot]436 commits | 53 | 22 | 29.4 | 1.6 |
| 2 | Robert Craigie50 commits | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 3 | K krpratic2 commits | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0 |
| 4 | J johan.stenberg1 commits | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | K kwhinnery1 commits | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | A apcha11 commits | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | A ahmedammarnaseer1 commits | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 9 92274156+karpetrosyan2 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 9 | D dmeadows9 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 10 | N npismenniy1 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| 11 | 1 17161397+kanchishimono1 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| 12 | S schuellerf1 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| 13 | A anthony.p.shaw1 commits | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 9 97478325+konnor-young1 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| 15 | B browniebroke1 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | H hintz1 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 17 | P peter.zhong1 commits | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| 18 | A agamble1 commits | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |