NavigaraNavigara
OrganizationsDistributionCompareResearch
NavigaraNavigara
OrganizationsDistributionCompareResearch
All developers

Matt Silverlock

Developer

Matt Silverlock

matt@eatsleeprepeat.net

130 commits~3 files/commit

Performance

YoY:+170%
2026Previous year

Insights

Key patterns and highlights from this developer's activity.

Peak MonthFeb'26116 performance
Growth Trend↓28%vs prior period
Avg Files/Commit3files per commit
Active Days78of 455 days
Top Repocloudflare-docs106 commits

Effort Over Time

Breakdown of growth, maintenance, and fixes effort over time.

Bug Behavior

Beta

Bugs introduced vs. fixed over time.

Investment Quality

Beta

Reclassifies engineering effort based on bug attribution. Commits that introduced bugs are retrospectively counted as poor investments.

29%Productive TimeGrowth 81% + Fixes 19%
65%Maintenance Time
6%Wasted Time
How it works

Methodology

Investment Quality reclassifies engineering effort based on bug attribution data. Commits identified as buggy origins (those that introduced bugs later fixed by someone) have their grow and maintenance time moved into the Wasted Time category. Their waste (fix commits) remains counted as productive. All other commits retain their standard classification: grow is productive, maintenance is maintenance, and waste (fixes) is productive.

Relationship to Growth / Maintenance / Fixes

The standard model classifies commits as Growth, Maintenance, or Fixes. Investment Quality adds a quality lens: a commit that introduced a bug is retrospectively counted as a poor investment — the engineering time spent on it was wasted because it ultimately required additional fix work. Fix commits (Fixes in the standard model) are reframed as productive, because fixing bugs is valuable work.

Proposed API Endpoint

Currently computed client-side from commit and bug attribution data. Ideal server-side endpoint:

POST /v1/organizations/{orgId}/investment-quality
Content-Type: application/json

Request:
{
  "startTime": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
  "endTime": "2025-12-31T23:59:59Z",
  "bucketSize": "BUCKET_SIZE_MONTH",
  "groupBy": ["repository_id" | "deliverer_email"]
}

Response:
{
  "productivePct": 74,
  "maintenancePct": 18,
  "wastedPct": 8,
  "buckets": [
    {
      "bucketStart": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
      "productive": 4.2,
      "maintenance": 1.8,
      "wasted": 0.6
    }
  ]
}

Recent Activity

Latest analyzed commits from this developer.

HashMessageDateFilesEffort
09b3028This commit **updates documentation** for **`bonk` fix requests** within the **`opencode` agents** system. It specifically modifies `.opencode/agents/bonk.md` to reflect an "implementation-first" approach for these requests. This **maintenance** task ensures that the documentation accurately describes the current design and development strategy, improving clarity for users and developers interacting with this feature.Mar 201maint
747fcceThis commit performs a **maintenance update** to the **Bonk workflow configurations**, involving significant renaming and model changes. The workflow previously known as `bonk.yml` has been renamed to `bigbonk.yml` and now defaults to the `claude-opus-4-6` AI model, alongside an updated trigger command. Concurrently, the workflow previously known as `lilbonk.yml` has been renamed to `bonk.yml` and now defaults to the `kimi-k2.5` AI model, with modifications to exclude `/bigbonk` mentions. These updates **redefine the default AI models** and operational parameters for the respective Bonk automation tasks, impacting their execution and output characteristics.Mar 192maint
1193e9bThis commit **introduces new capabilities** by adding the **Kimi K2.5 model configuration** to the `cloudflare-ai-gateway` provider, detailing its specific capabilities and limits. Concurrently, it establishes a **new GitHub Actions workflow** named `lilbonk.yml` to automate tasks based on issue and pull request comments. This work enhances both the **available AI models** for integration and the **project's CI/CD automation**, streamlining development and expanding AI service offerings.Mar 22grow
b25819bThis commit introduces a **refactoring** to the **`bonk.yml` GitHub Actions workflow** to **improve its early exit condition**. Specifically, it optimizes the workflow's execution by ensuring it **exits more efficiently** when a "mention" (e.g., a specific keyword or user tag) is not present. This change prevents unnecessary subsequent steps from running, thereby **reducing CI/CD resource consumption** and speeding up feedback cycles for irrelevant triggers. The **`bonk` workflow** will now be more performant and resource-conscious.Feb 241maint
bbeb3b2This commit refines the **CI/CD workflow** by adjusting the trigger conditions for the `bigbonk` job. Specifically, the `.github/workflows/bigbonk.yml` file was updated to ensure the `bonk` job only executes if the triggering comment explicitly contains the `/bigbonk` command. This **maintenance** change improves the precision of workflow invocations, **preventing unintended runs** and making the automated process more controlled and efficient. It impacts how developers interact with the `bigbonk` automation, requiring a specific command for execution.Feb 241maint
139948cThis commit performs a **maintenance chore** by updating the `fetch-depth` configuration within the **GitHub Actions workflow** responsible for `new-pr-review`, located at `.github/workflows/new-pr-review.yml`. The `fetch-depth` is increased to 30, meaning the workflow will now fetch the last 30 commits of the repository history. This adjustment provides more historical context for automated review tools and scripts, ensuring they have sufficient data to perform accurate comparisons and analyses during pull request checks.Feb 241maint
652cdd9This commit **improves** the **PR review prompt** within the **GitHub Actions workflow** defined in `.github/workflows/new-pr-review.yml`. Specifically, it **adds the pull request number and repository information** to the prompt's context. This **enhancement** provides better steering for the automated review process, aiming to generate more relevant and accurate feedback by supplying crucial contextual details.Feb 241grow
a2687a5This commit **enhances the `bonk` automated PR reviewer** by updating its prompt to include a new rule. The modification to `.github/bonk_reviewer.md` instructs the reviewer to explicitly confirm it is acting on the correct issue or pull request. This **feature improvement** aims to **increase the accuracy and contextual relevance of automated review comments**, preventing misdirected feedback. Consequently, it will lead to a more reliable and efficient **code review workflow** by ensuring the bot's comments are always on-topic.Feb 241grow
4924a3aIntroduces a new GitHub Actions workflow (`bigbonk.yml`) that provides a new operational capability for handling larger tasks, triggerable via `/bigbonk`.Feb 241grow
3dd7199This is an isolated, minor update to the `bonk.yml` configuration file, with no production impact.Feb 232maint
1e06eecThis commit updates permissions for the new PR review GitHub workflow, granting `write` access to resolve a functional issue. This ensures the workflow can now execute its tasks correctly.Feb 231waste
dfbe3a5Affects the internal review prompt used by the "bonk reviewer" process. This is an isolated documentation cleanup, removing an explicit reference with no production impact.Feb 231maint
22a16aeThis is an isolated refactoring of internal GitHub workflows, specifically how PR review prompts are managed. It has no impact on the product or external users.Feb 232maint
478067dThis commit updates the GitHub Actions workflow for new PR reviews, making automated prompts suggestion-only and adding a timeout. It impacts the development process by refining automated feedback and improving workflow reliability, with no direct production impact.Feb 231maint
bf39112This commit introduces new GitHub Actions workflows, adding automated PR review capabilities triggered by comments or automatically, thereby enhancing the development workflow with new CI/CD automation.Feb 232grow
c58b831This commit **enhances the Changelog page** by **limiting the number of rendered entries** on `src/pages/changelog/index.astro` to a maximum of 50. This **performance optimization** aims to improve page load times and reduce visual clutter for users browsing the changelog. To maintain full accessibility to historical data, an **empty state message** is now displayed when no entries are found, providing a direct link to search for older or specific changelog items. This change significantly improves the initial user experience of the **Changelog feature** while guiding users to more comprehensive search options.Feb 201grow
6374c31This commit **refactors** the **`review-code-examples` command** by replacing its direct agent reference with a more structured **`code-review` skill**. The configuration in `.opencode/command/review-code-examples.md` was updated to specify a new model and include clearer instructions for code editing within documentation reviews. This change primarily impacts the **AI agent configuration** and **LLM interaction** for documentation reviews. The sharpened command wording aims to improve the **LLM's understanding and execution** of code review tasks, leading to more precise and effective feedback for users leveraging this AI-powered feature.Feb 202maint
d164737This commit **refactors** the **`changelog` command** by **migrating its core logic** to a newly introduced **agent skill**. The existing command, defined in `.opencode/command/changelog.md`, now delegates its operations to this new skill, which is detailed in `.agents/skills/changelog/SKILL.md`. This **new capability** centralizes the management of product changelog entries, encompassing creation, updates, and reviews, within the agent skill framework. The change **simplifies the command's internal implementation** and enhances the modularity and extensibility of changelog-related functionalities.Feb 192grow
9846367Fixes a write permission issue within the `bonk` module's content handling. This is an isolated fix.Feb 181–
0fee6bbThis commit primarily **fixes** an issue causing the **`bonk` GitHub Actions job** to get stuck indefinitely in CI by implementing a 30-minute timeout. Complementing this, the **agent's `code-review` skill documentation** is updated to direct the agent to use local `node_modules` or existing search tools for references, reducing reliance on external fetches that could contribute to CI hangs. This **maintenance** work also introduces a new `opencode.jsonc` configuration file with default permissions and experimental settings. Together, these changes enhance CI stability and streamline agent operations by promoting local resource utilization.Feb 136maint
09b3028Mar 20

This commit **updates documentation** for **`bonk` fix requests** within the **`opencode` agents** system. It specifically modifies `.opencode/agents/bonk.md` to reflect an "implementation-first" approach for these requests. This **maintenance** task ensures that the documentation accurately describes the current design and development strategy, improving clarity for users and developers interacting with this feature.

1 filesmaint
747fcceMar 19

This commit performs a **maintenance update** to the **Bonk workflow configurations**, involving significant renaming and model changes. The workflow previously known as `bonk.yml` has been renamed to `bigbonk.yml` and now defaults to the `claude-opus-4-6` AI model, alongside an updated trigger command. Concurrently, the workflow previously known as `lilbonk.yml` has been renamed to `bonk.yml` and now defaults to the `kimi-k2.5` AI model, with modifications to exclude `/bigbonk` mentions. These updates **redefine the default AI models** and operational parameters for the respective Bonk automation tasks, impacting their execution and output characteristics.

2 filesmaint
1193e9bMar 2

This commit **introduces new capabilities** by adding the **Kimi K2.5 model configuration** to the `cloudflare-ai-gateway` provider, detailing its specific capabilities and limits. Concurrently, it establishes a **new GitHub Actions workflow** named `lilbonk.yml` to automate tasks based on issue and pull request comments. This work enhances both the **available AI models** for integration and the **project's CI/CD automation**, streamlining development and expanding AI service offerings.

2 filesgrow
b25819bFeb 24

This commit introduces a **refactoring** to the **`bonk.yml` GitHub Actions workflow** to **improve its early exit condition**. Specifically, it optimizes the workflow's execution by ensuring it **exits more efficiently** when a "mention" (e.g., a specific keyword or user tag) is not present. This change prevents unnecessary subsequent steps from running, thereby **reducing CI/CD resource consumption** and speeding up feedback cycles for irrelevant triggers. The **`bonk` workflow** will now be more performant and resource-conscious.

1 filesmaint
bbeb3b2Feb 24

This commit refines the **CI/CD workflow** by adjusting the trigger conditions for the `bigbonk` job. Specifically, the `.github/workflows/bigbonk.yml` file was updated to ensure the `bonk` job only executes if the triggering comment explicitly contains the `/bigbonk` command. This **maintenance** change improves the precision of workflow invocations, **preventing unintended runs** and making the automated process more controlled and efficient. It impacts how developers interact with the `bigbonk` automation, requiring a specific command for execution.

1 filesmaint
139948cFeb 24

This commit performs a **maintenance chore** by updating the `fetch-depth` configuration within the **GitHub Actions workflow** responsible for `new-pr-review`, located at `.github/workflows/new-pr-review.yml`. The `fetch-depth` is increased to 30, meaning the workflow will now fetch the last 30 commits of the repository history. This adjustment provides more historical context for automated review tools and scripts, ensuring they have sufficient data to perform accurate comparisons and analyses during pull request checks.

1 filesmaint
652cdd9Feb 24

This commit **improves** the **PR review prompt** within the **GitHub Actions workflow** defined in `.github/workflows/new-pr-review.yml`. Specifically, it **adds the pull request number and repository information** to the prompt's context. This **enhancement** provides better steering for the automated review process, aiming to generate more relevant and accurate feedback by supplying crucial contextual details.

1 filesgrow
a2687a5Feb 24

This commit **enhances the `bonk` automated PR reviewer** by updating its prompt to include a new rule. The modification to `.github/bonk_reviewer.md` instructs the reviewer to explicitly confirm it is acting on the correct issue or pull request. This **feature improvement** aims to **increase the accuracy and contextual relevance of automated review comments**, preventing misdirected feedback. Consequently, it will lead to a more reliable and efficient **code review workflow** by ensuring the bot's comments are always on-topic.

1 filesgrow
4924a3aFeb 24

Introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow (`bigbonk.yml`) that provides a new operational capability for handling larger tasks, triggerable via `/bigbonk`.

1 filesgrow
3dd7199Feb 23

This is an isolated, minor update to the `bonk.yml` configuration file, with no production impact.

2 filesmaint
1e06eecFeb 23

This commit updates permissions for the new PR review GitHub workflow, granting `write` access to resolve a functional issue. This ensures the workflow can now execute its tasks correctly.

1 fileswaste
dfbe3a5Feb 23

Affects the internal review prompt used by the "bonk reviewer" process. This is an isolated documentation cleanup, removing an explicit reference with no production impact.

1 filesmaint
22a16aeFeb 23

This is an isolated refactoring of internal GitHub workflows, specifically how PR review prompts are managed. It has no impact on the product or external users.

2 filesmaint
478067dFeb 23

This commit updates the GitHub Actions workflow for new PR reviews, making automated prompts suggestion-only and adding a timeout. It impacts the development process by refining automated feedback and improving workflow reliability, with no direct production impact.

1 filesmaint
bf39112Feb 23

This commit introduces new GitHub Actions workflows, adding automated PR review capabilities triggered by comments or automatically, thereby enhancing the development workflow with new CI/CD automation.

2 filesgrow
c58b831Feb 20

This commit **enhances the Changelog page** by **limiting the number of rendered entries** on `src/pages/changelog/index.astro` to a maximum of 50. This **performance optimization** aims to improve page load times and reduce visual clutter for users browsing the changelog. To maintain full accessibility to historical data, an **empty state message** is now displayed when no entries are found, providing a direct link to search for older or specific changelog items. This change significantly improves the initial user experience of the **Changelog feature** while guiding users to more comprehensive search options.

1 filesgrow
6374c31Feb 20

This commit **refactors** the **`review-code-examples` command** by replacing its direct agent reference with a more structured **`code-review` skill**. The configuration in `.opencode/command/review-code-examples.md` was updated to specify a new model and include clearer instructions for code editing within documentation reviews. This change primarily impacts the **AI agent configuration** and **LLM interaction** for documentation reviews. The sharpened command wording aims to improve the **LLM's understanding and execution** of code review tasks, leading to more precise and effective feedback for users leveraging this AI-powered feature.

2 filesmaint
d164737Feb 19

This commit **refactors** the **`changelog` command** by **migrating its core logic** to a newly introduced **agent skill**. The existing command, defined in `.opencode/command/changelog.md`, now delegates its operations to this new skill, which is detailed in `.agents/skills/changelog/SKILL.md`. This **new capability** centralizes the management of product changelog entries, encompassing creation, updates, and reviews, within the agent skill framework. The change **simplifies the command's internal implementation** and enhances the modularity and extensibility of changelog-related functionalities.

2 filesgrow
9846367Feb 18

Fixes a write permission issue within the `bonk` module's content handling. This is an isolated fix.

1 files–
0fee6bbFeb 13

This commit primarily **fixes** an issue causing the **`bonk` GitHub Actions job** to get stuck indefinitely in CI by implementing a 30-minute timeout. Complementing this, the **agent's `code-review` skill documentation** is updated to direct the agent to use local `node_modules` or existing search tools for references, reducing reliance on external fetches that could contribute to CI hangs. This **maintenance** work also introduces a new `opencode.jsonc` configuration file with default permissions and experimental settings. Together, these changes enhance CI stability and streamline agent operations by promoting local resource utilization.

6 filesmaint

Work Patterns

Beta

Commit activity distribution by hour and day of week. Shows when this developer is most active.

Collaboration

Beta

Developers who frequently work on the same files and symbols. Higher score means stronger code collaboration.

NavigaraNavigara
OrganizationsDistributionCompareResearch